The Forest Service does not understand why it’s inappropriate for Rosemont’s PR firm to organize public comments

Excellent overview article in the Tucson Weekly.

The Forest Service’s response to Rosemont’s PR firm planning the public comment process is: “[i]t was just logistics—just helping us with the workload.”

So according to the Forest Service, it is apparently ok for a private party that stands to gain hundred of millions of dollars from the exploitation of public lands to help with “logistics.”

Unbelievable.  What other logistics is it ok for Augusta/Rosemont to help with?

This entry was posted in EIS, General, Public Comment and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.